
It turns out all these owners can get a free maintenance service. I wonder how many response they will get!

It all started not so long ago when posters in the shelters of bus stops started popping up, showing the word 'Datzo', visualized in a logo from well known insurance companies.
With Google, the 'Datzo' website is found easily. The website offers you the most ridiculous insurances, way too many tabs and a guy who's looking like a typical person who you wouldn't want to handle your insurance stuff. Not really a website to take seriously…especially considering the subject.
It took me a while to find out what really was the point... But here it is.
There is a new insurance company on the market, called 'Ditzo'. Now 'Ditzo' has released a guerilla campaign in which they refer to all the other insurance companies as 'Datzo'. So instead of using the real competitors names, they've just chosen to use a collective name, associated to the name of their own company. Pretty clever!!
Ditzo makes a few promises other insurance companies don’t (like when your car is total loss, you get a car equally to the one you had) so that’s how they differentiate. With a little over 1300 views in just one week I think the campaign can really become a hit.
Now just wait and see if they can get people to sign up for their insurances!
Viewing experience changes because of online TV
The current possibility to watch TV on the PC as well, has changed the viewing experience of the medium. 'Relaxing' and 'Entertaining' are more often attached to online TV than to the original TV. The cause of this development can be the choice the consumer has with online TV. The viewer can decide what he/she wants to see, and it is more likely the consumer will choose entertainment shows in stead of serious topics.
TV and magazines share first place identification In 2004 the TV was still on the second place, behind magazines concerning identification. The fact that they now share the first place is probably because of the personalization of the TV; the distance between channel and consumer appears to become smaller.
Magazines score on practical usability
Magazines have a higher score regarding practical usability this year. For background information the consumer rather consults a magazine than the internet. Two of the possible causes of this development can be the growth of the number of specialized magazines, or the debate about the reliability of the internet.
Media experience daily papers stable
Of all types of media, the daily papers still score best on information factor and 'touch' factor.
Internet as an entertainment medium.
The development of Web2.0 and it's user generated content has shifted the value of the medium internet. At the moment it is more used for entertainment of filling empty moment. It also generates more conversation topics. Social networks like Hyves and video sites like YouTube are part of this development.
The fieldwork took place from the 13th of June to the 7th of July 2007. 1493 Dutch people from 13 years and older are questioned for the Media experience investigation 2007.
Source: TNS NIPO/Veldkamp
The development of Web2.0 and it's most important characteristic 'user generated content' are a hot topic on the internet. The interaction between customer and company is much improved because of this development. That this could lead to many advantages for the marketing industry seems obvious, but the Canadian supermarket chain 'President's Choice' proves the advantage with a perfect example of gaining customer insights with the help of the online possibilities.
Customers of the supermarket chain can write online product reviews. While doing that they are asked if the information they supply can be freely used by P.C. As a result, customers can now read other customer's quotes in the supermarket right at the product itself. For example, a quote currently shown at the vegetarian lasagne: "Even my 17 year old, vegetable hating son loves it".
Naturally the store shows only positive product reviews. But to be taken seriously as a company, P.C. realized they had to use the negative feedback as well. So this is now forwarded to the product development department. As a result, products can be taken off the shelves and be improved very quickly.
I wonder if the quote technique would work in the Netherlands. Maybe we are just too 'cool' to be touched by dramatic sentences like that. Ratings might work thought. These are more to the point. The way they use the negative feedback is great though. It's an easy way of getting more customer insight and the PD department directly knows what part of the product should be improved.
Source: Emerce
Read the complete article hier
Would you rather learn to make good powerpoint presentations to keep your audience awake? Check this out.
Thanks to Upstream.
‘De boom staat symbool voor het totaalwarenhuis van Nederland. Alles onder een dak, diep geworteld in de Nederlandse samenleving en elk seizoen weer anders.’
Part 1: General musical interests
The ages of the people I interviewed varied from 27 to 51. I interviewed 3 women and 3 men.
For 5 out of 6 people, music is important in their lives. It influences them in all kinds of ways: when they like a song they buy a CD (2) or download it (3), they go out dancing, they go to concerts and listen to music while driving their car. One person said it influences her mood; music makes her happy or sad. Every person interviewed relates music to memories.
Their music taste varies from Deep Purple to Tiësto, from the Eagles to Phil Collins and from the Golden Earring to Robbie Williams.
For most people their music taste has not changed over the years, it only did for one person; from rock to R&B/ Pop.
Social value scored much higher, an average of 4.
It’s interesting to see that cultural value was important for the women (score 5) but not so important for men (score 2).
All interviewed people agree that it is important to preserve the Dutch musical heritage.
Neither of the people had ever heard of the
Part 2: the museum and its goals
After this first part of exploring the role music plays in general in our target groups lives, I explained the museum and its goals.
All the people think it is a good initiative, but only three consider actually visiting the museum some time. If there is to come a ‘
Although only three would visit it, all agree that a
All people answered that they like the initiative and that if they would see it somewhere, they’d support it. Supporting would be done by telling around (4) and if possible signing a petition that the
To the question ‘How does this card make you feel?’ five people answered: curious. This is exactly what we were hoping for. But of course one person answered something different. She said she didn’t feel anything and she would throw it away. I showed her another card with an artist I thought she might like more and asked her if this changed her mind. It didn’t because she still didn’t like the artist, but she came to the conclusion that if she saw a card with an artist she liked, she would be curious as well. For the promotion campaign it is thus important we have a big variety of artists shown on the cards.
- Make it clear on the cards that the museum already exists; now I would think there’s nothing there yet and that there is only a plan for a
- Music is a colorful thing. Can’t the cards be more colorful?
All remarks are taken in consideration and used in the project.
All four would send the game to people they know, especially if this improves their chances of winning.
- To much information/ chaos
- Takes too ling to find information
- It’s not up to date
- Looks unprofessional
- Looks boring
- Too many colours
- Logo sucks
- Menu not readable
- I hate the scrolling
After that I showed them the prototype we’ve developed for the
One person said ‘No’, five people said ‘Yes, but…’.
I asked the person who said ‘No’, what she didn’t like about it. She answered that she thought it was too black. She did think it looked more professional and organized though. We’ve taken this comment in consideration and will use more shades of grey.
Other comments on the site were:
- I’d like more space, now it still looks messy to me
- I’d like the headers to be bigger
Positive remarks were:
- I feel like watching the movie
- I want to click on the items shown on the homepage (3)
- This looks professional (5)
- The menu looks clear
- I like the search function! (4)
To prove the phrase stated in the title of this essay either wrong or right, we’ll have to define the meaning of the word ‘innovation’. A random dictionary translates the word innovation as ‘the introduction of something new’. But in today’s world, what is new? Is it body lotion with ‘skin-identical lipids’, extra large coffee-pads for a mug of coffee instead of a cup, or a cell phone with a 3.0 megapixel camera instead of 2.0? These products are all introduced to the market as innovative, but are they really? Or are they just improvements of products which ones were innovations? And even more important, what is the role of the value a consumer attaches to the so-called innovation? Should the word ‘innovative’ be related to the value the consumer attaches to it? Can a product be tagged ‘innovative’ if the consumer doesn’t want it?
A perfect example of a case which emphasizes that innovation without a customer is not innovation is the Nestlé story in April of this year. With the help of many experts, Nestlé decided it was time to ‘innovate’ their chocolate brand Cailler. A new recipe and a new wrap were the result. One thing Nestlé ‘forgot’ was to research whether there actually was a need for this innovation. What should have been a boost for the traditional chocolate brand eventually ended up as a total failure. One of the causes for this failure was the non-recyclable wrap. In a time like this, where climate changes and environmental issues are a huge trend, Nestlé could have easily known the non-recyclable wrap would not be a good idea. Not only research about the needs and wants of the customers lacked; apparently research lacked at all points.
A person with an interesting view on new products is Gijs van Wulfen. This economist, writer, marketer and innovation accelerator doesn’t only have an opinion about what innovation is, but also knows the importance of customer insights.
Gijs van Wulfen sees it this way: each ‘new’ product can be placed in a category. There are three different categories: new to the world, new to the market and new to the company.
In his opinion, innovation can be applied in all three categories. The classification just decides what the amount of innovation is. Clearly the new to the world products are the most innovative; new to the company products are innovative as well, but just for the company.
I consider new to the market and new to the company products not as innovative. I rather see them as ‘me too’ products or improvements of products that already exist.
But let’s say there is a new to the world product. It’s never been seen before. This would then be called a truly innovative product. But then there is the customer issue. Does the world, to which the product is so new, need it? When innovating, Gijs van Wulfen emphasizes the importance of customer insights: “A customer insight is a fresh and not-yet-obvious understanding of customers that can become the basis for competitive advantage.”
Especially in this time where (potential) customers can so easily be reached (internet), this should be one of the first steps in the process of developing a new product. But Nestlé is not the only company who lacks researching customer insights. Recent research done by MarketResponse shows that marketers lack to explore good ways to get customer insights. The current developments on the internet make it easy for marketers to contact their (potential) customers. All they have to do is take a look at social networking websites to find out about their preferences. It appears from the research that many marketers don’t know how to handle the information.
In my opinion in the process of innovating could be enriched with customer insights easily this way. All the marketers have to do is take the step into this world that seems so hard for them to reach.
I think a product can only be tagged ‘innovative’ when it meets two requirements:
1. The product is new to the world
2. There is a market for the product
When the newly introduced product doesn’t meet one of these requirements, I think it is not innovative. Is it not new to the world, but there is a market for it? That is fine, but not innovative. It is simply a ‘me too’ product or an improvement of an existing product. Is the product new to the world, but there is no market for it? Then the product is useless, it will not generate profit and it is not worth the word innovative. It’s clear that an innovation defined as above, results in very little innovations a year. But isn’t this what being innovative is all about? Not every company can simply define themselves as being innovative; it is something you have to earn by introducing a world-changing product. It takes understanding your customer and whole lot of creativity and competence, not just adding to word ‘innovative’ to your positioning.
Literature
Jacqueline Fackeldey. Innovatie zonder de klant is geen innovatie: Nestlé chocola voor alle Zwitsers. Molblog.